4.5 Article

Mechanical spectral hole burning in polymer solutions: Comparison with large amplitude oscillatory shear fingerprinting

期刊

JOURNAL OF RHEOLOGY
卷 58, 期 1, 页码 43-62

出版社

JOURNAL RHEOLOGY AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1122/1.4829283

关键词

-

资金

  1. John R. Bradford Endowment at Texas Tech University
  2. National Science Foundation [DMR-0934305]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS) fingerprinting of the nonlinear response of polymers and other complex soft matter has proven an excellent tool in the characterization of such materials. The major methods of quantitative characterization of nonlinearity using LAOS are the use of Lissajous-Bowditch (LB) curves and Fourier transform rheology (FTR). Another LAOS-based tool, mechanical spectral hole burning (MSHB), has been developed in our labs to investigate the heterogeneous dynamics of polymer melts and solutions and offers the possibility of a complementary method to the LB and FTR analyses for the fingerprinting of the nonlinear response of polymers and other complex fluids. Here, we present results from an investigation of the MSHB, LB loop, and FTR behaviors of polybutadiene and polystyrene solutions. The goal of the study was to examine similarities and differences in how these methods fingerprint the nonlinear response of the different polymer solutions. We find that the vertical holes in the MSHB experiments vary in intensity with the square of the sine wave pump magnitude. This is also true for the third harmonics obtained in the FTR, but the origins are possibly different for the two signatures. We have analyzed the fingerprinting categories as a function of strain amplitude and frequency from the LB loops and higher harmonics of FTR and add an additional feature to the fingerprints that are related to MSHB signatures, which are found to complement the other two methods and add new information to the fingerprinting diagrams. (C) 2014 The Society of Rheology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据