4.5 Article

Response of elastoviscoplastic materials to large amplitude oscillatory shear flow in the parallel-plate and cylindrical-Couette geometries

期刊

JOURNAL OF RHEOLOGY
卷 57, 期 6, 页码 1569-1596

出版社

JOURNAL RHEOLOGY AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1122/1.4820495

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC36-08-GO28308]
  2. National Renewable Energy Laboratory
  3. BioEnergy Technologies Office

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most investigations of large amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS) rheometry to date have presumed uniform shear. The study of structured materials would especially benefit from LAOS rheometry but require the use of the larger gaps and roughened surfaces in parallel-plate and cylindrical-Couette geometries. However, in these geometries, the shear profiles are not homogeneous throughout the deformation field. For elastoviscoplastic materials undergoing LAOS in these geometries, both elastic and viscoplastic deformations may occur simultaneously, complicating the data analysis. By means of model simulations, we provide a comprehensive picture of a model elastoviscoplastic material undergoing oscillatory shear deformation in the parallel-plate and cylindrical-Couette geometries, and we compare the oscillatory signals to those obtained from a uniform-shear field. Both displacement-controlled and torque-controlled oscillatory flows were simulated. We show that using popular linear formulas for mapping displacement to strain and torque to stress results in strain and stress signals that deviate significantly from their uniform-shear counterparts. For some limited cases, specifically displacement-controlled parallel-plate and torque-controlled cylindrical-Couette oscillatory rheometry, the use of advanced mapping methods to improve the calculation of strain and stress signals was demonstrated. As an alternative, we suggest that analyzing LAOS signals via constitutive modeling provides a unifying approach. (C) 2013 The Society of Rheology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据