4.4 Review

The basis and value of currently used immunomodulatory therapies in recurrent miscarriage

期刊

JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY
卷 93, 期 1, 页码 41-51

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jri.2011.10.002

关键词

Recurrent miscarriage; NK cells; T cells; Treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recurrent miscarriage (RM) without an obvious identifiable cause may arise from excessive maternal land natural killer (NK) cell activity against the trophoblast or early embryo. Impaired regulatory T cell function leading to increased pro-inflammatory Th17 and NK cell cytotoxicity may be central. Ongoing subclinical endometrial infection and/or inflammation with increased secretion of TNF alpha and stimulation of autoimmunity to heat shock proteins may also be contributory. Therapies with a varying theoretical basis and clinical evidence aimed at reducing excessive endometrial immune activity have been used non-selectively in women with RM with variable success. Recent work has now improved our understanding of the role of the different immune cells and proteins that are important at each stage of a normal pregnancy. The vulnerability of the early embryo to land NK cell-mediated rejection suggests that immune-based therapies need to be maximally effective during early pregnancy. Targeting RM women with demonstrable land NK cell activity may improve the overall clinical efficacy of these treatments. It may also prevent costly and possibly harmful use in women who are unlikely to respond, and make better use of scarce resources. This report describes the underlying principles behind the use of the different immune-based therapies. The broad evidence supporting their efficacy is also described, as are the possible adverse consequences. Suggestions are also made on how the maternal immune system may be positively modulated using current, widely available treatments that have minimal or no side effects. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据