4.2 Article

Affected homologeus chromosome pairing and phosphorylation of testis specific histone, H2AX, in male meiosis under FKBP6 deficiency

期刊

JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 54, 期 3, 页码 203-207

出版社

SOCIETY REPRODUCTION & DEVELOPMENT-SRD
DOI: 10.1262/jrd.19158

关键词

chromosome pairing; FK506 binding protein 6 (FKBP6); meiosis; mouse; phosphorylated histone H2AX (gamma H2AX); rat

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A gene for FK506 binding protein 6 (Fkbp6) expresses during a specific stage of male and female meiosis. Disruption of the gene influences male reproduction, i.e. arrests spermatogenesis, but not female reproduction. Using the mouse model (targeted disruption), the role of the gene in homologous chromosome pairing has been demonstrated in a previous study. For further understanding the function of Fkbp6 in chromosome synapsis, we evaluated chromosome pairings during male meiosis in the as/as rat, a spontaneous null mutation, and compared them with those of the mouse model. Electron microscopy of the pachytene nuclei unveiled several types of abnormal chromosome pairing in the rat model, as shown in the mouse previously. The frequencies of aberrant pairings in the knockout mice and mutant rats were 42 of 67 nuclei (62.7%) and 20 out of 74 nuclei (27.0%), respectively. In order to clarify the mechanism of male specific infertility in Fkbp6 deficiency, the localization of gamma H2AX, a marker protein of XY chromosome inactivation during male meiosis, was examined. Immunostaining Of gamma H2AX unveiled normal localization of the molecule to XY chromosomes (XY body) in both models, showing the independency of FKBP6 in sex chromosome inactivation. Besides the XY body, focal localization of gamma H2AX was observed in accordance with the unsynapsed chromosomes in both types of null animal. These results indicate the fundamental role of Fkbp6 in homologous chromosome synapsis during male meiosis. In conclusion, male specific infertility under Fkbp6 deficiency remains unsolved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据