4.3 Article

Evaluation of Metabolic Risk Marker in Obesity-related Glomerulopathy

期刊

JOURNAL OF RENAL NUTRITION
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 309-315

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.jrn.2010.06.019

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30800546]
  2. Ministry of Education of China [200802841008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Insulin resistance is a common metabolic abnormality, which increases the risk of renal events in obesity. The present study is aimed to examine the relation between metabolic factors and obesity-related glomerulopathy (ORG), and then compare the risk markers of insulin resistance for clinical prediction. Methods: A total of 112 cases with proven renal ORG and 135 age-and gender-matched lean controls were included. The degree of proteinuria, endogenous creatinine clearance rate, body mass index, amylin, fasting glucose, insulin, lipid and lipoprotein concentrations were measured during the steady state. Results: The patients with ORG were clinically characterized by increased body mass index and proteinuria, with higher levels of amylin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), insulin, glucose, and lipid proteins when compared with the lean controls. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that amylin and HOMA-IR were significantly associated with the prevalence of ORG. In patients with ORG, proteinuria level correlated with amylin, total cholesterol, fasting insulin, and HOMA-IR. Moreover, proteinuria correlated positively with HOMA-IR and amylin in a multiple regression analysis. In addition, the endogenous creatinine clearance rate did not correlate with any metabolic marker. Conclusion: This study suggested that screening for HOMA-IR might have predictive value for renal damage in obese patients. In addition to insulin resistance, amylin also showed positive effects on evaluation of such renal impairment. (C) 2011 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据