4.3 Article

Inadequate energy and excess protein intakes may be associated with worsening renal function in chronic kidney disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF RENAL NUTRITION
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 187-194

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.jrn.2007.08.003

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Dietary energy and protein play important roles in chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study investigates the relationship between energy/protein intake status and renal function in CKD. Design and Study Population: This cross-sectional study included 599 adult patients diagnosed with stage 3 to 5 CKD in nephrology and nutrition outpatient clinics in Taiwan. Main Outcome Measure: Energy and protein intakes were assessed using 24-h dietary recall. We recorded recommended calorie/protein amounts and renal function indices, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN). Patients were categorized into three intake calorie/protein groups by a ratio of actual intake vs. recommended intake. High intake was defined as a ratio of actual intake/recommended intake >= 110%, moderate intake as >= 90% to <110%, and low intake as <90%. Data were analyzed by paired t test, one-way analysis of variance, least significant differences, and multiple linear regression. Results: The energy and protein intakes in CKD patients were significantly higher and lower than recommended levels (P <.001). Low energy intake was significantly related to worsening GFR at increments of -4.41 mL/min/1.73 m 2, compared with moderate and high energy intake (P =.008); high protein intake was also associated with worsening GFR at increments of -3.50 mL/min/1.73m(2), compared with moderate and low protein intake (P <.001). Low energy intake and high protein intake were significantly positively correlated with elevations in creatinine and BUN. Conclusion: Lower energy and higher protein intakes than recommended may be associated with deteriorating renal function. (C) 2008 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据