4.5 Article

Electrospun polystyrene/polyacrylonitrile fiber with high oil sorption capacity

期刊

JOURNAL OF REINFORCED PLASTICS AND COMPOSITES
卷 33, 期 20, 页码 1849-1858

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0731684414547554

关键词

Electrospinning; polystyrene; polyacrylonitrile; fiber; oil sorption

资金

  1. NSFC (National Natural Science Foundation of China) [51203186]
  2. Converging Research Center Program - Korean Ministry of Education [2013K000415]
  3. Project of Science and Technology Program for Basic Research of Qingdao [12-1-4-7-(6)-jch]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A high-capacity oil sorbent is fabricated by electrospinning a polystyrene and polyacrylonitrile blend. The influences of several processing parameters including the spinning solution concentration, environmental temperature, applied voltage, relative humidity, and inner diameter of the metal needle on the morphology and oil sorption capacity are investigated. All the parameters are found to have an effect on the morphology and sorption capacity; furthermore, the relative humidity plays an important role in determining the fiber surface roughness. The highest sorption capacity is obtained under the following conditions: the spinning solution concentration is 18%, the environmental temperature is 30?, the applied voltage is 25kV, the relative humidity is 40%, and the nozzle inner diameter of metal needle is 0.6mm. This produces a fibrous sorbent with uniform morphology, a thinner diameter, and the highest sorption capacity. The maximum sorption capacities of the polystyrene/polyacrylonitrile sorbent for pump oil, peanut oil, diesel, and gasoline are 194.85, 131.7, 66.75, and 43.38g/g, respectively. Polystyrene/polyacrylonitrile fiber is compared with polystyrene fiber through mechanical tests. The sorption kinetic data for the four oils could be well described by the pseudo-second order rate equation. The sorption equilibrium time for pump oil, peanut oil, diesel, and gasoline was 56.27, 16.24, 5.16, and 3.52min, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据