4.2 Article

3D QSAR based design of novel oxindole derivative as 5HT7 inhibitors

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/10799893.2013.869601

关键词

5-hydroxytryptamine; antidepressants; comparative molecular field analysis; comparative molecular similarity indices analysis; G protein coupled receptor; oxindole derivatives; three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship

资金

  1. DST [SR/FT/CS-040/2009]
  2. CSIR [01/(2436)/10/EMR-II]
  3. UGC, New Delhi, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To understand the structural requirements of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5HT(7)) receptor inhibitors and to design new ligands against 5HT(7) receptor with enhanced inhibitory potency, a three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship study with comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA) for a data set of 56 molecules consisting of oxindole, tetrahydronaphthalene, aryl ketone substituted arylpiperazinealkylamide derivatives was performed. Derived model showed good statistical reliability in terms of predicting 5HT(7) inhibitory activity of the molecules, based on molecular property fields like steric, electrostatic, hydrophobic, hydrogen bond donor and hydrogen bond acceptor fields. This is evident from statistical parameters like conventional r(2) and a cross validated (q(2)) values of 0.985, 0.743 for CoMFA and 0.970, 0.608 for CoMSIA, respectively. Predictive ability of the models to determine 5HT(7) antagonistic activity is validated using a test set of 16 molecules that were not included in the training set. Predictive r(2) obtained for the test set was 0.560 and 0.619 for CoMFA and CoMSIA, respectively. Steric, electrostatic fields majorly contributed toward activity which forms the basis for design of new molecules. Absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination (ADME) calculation using QikProp 2.5 (Schrodinger 2010, Portland, OR) reveals that the molecules confer to Lipinski's rule of five in majority of the cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据