4.4 Article

Validity and reliability of Kinect skeleton for measuring shoulder joint angles: a feasibility study

期刊

PHYSIOTHERAPY
卷 101, 期 4, 页码 389-393

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2015.02.002

关键词

Microsoft Kinect; Motion analysis; Skeleton tracking; Virtual reality; Measurement accuracy; Shoulder rehabilitation

资金

  1. Mathworks
  2. Northeastern University Provost Tier 1 grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To test the reliability and validity of shoulder joint angle measurements from the Microsoft Kinect (TM) for virtual rehabilitation. Design Test retest reliability and concurrent validity, feasibility study. Setting Motion analysis laboratory. Participants A convenience sample of 10 healthy adults. Methods Shoulder joint angle was assessed in four static poses, two trials for each pose, using: (1) the Kinect; (2) a three-dimensional motion analysis system; and (3) a clinical goniometer. All poses were captured with the Kinect from the frontal view. The two poses of shoulder flexion were also captured with the Kinect from the sagittal view. Main outcome measures Absolute and relative test retest reliability of the Kinect for the measurement of shoulder angle was determined in each pose with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), standard error of the measure and minimal detectable change. The 95% limits of agreement (LOA) between the Kinect and the standard methods for measuring shoulder angle were computed to determine concurrent validity. Results While the Kinect provided to be highly reliable (ICC 0.76-0.98) for measuring shoulder angle from the frontal view, the 95% LOA between the Kinect and the two measurement standards were greater than +/- 5 degrees in all poses for both views. Conclusions Before the Kinect is used to measure movements for virtual rehabilitation applications, it is imperative to understand its limitations in precision and accuracy for the measurement of specific joint motions. (C) 2015 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据