4.3 Article

Human cell responses to ionizing radiation are differentially affected by the expressed connexins

期刊

JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH
卷 54, 期 2, 页码 251-259

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrs099

关键词

gap junction permeability; cohort effects; radiotherapy; stress response; linear energy transfer; radiation quality

资金

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NNJ06HD91]
  2. National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health [CA049062]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In multicellular organisms, intercellular communication is essential for homeostatic functions and has a major role in tissue responses to stress. Here, we describe the effects of expression of different connexins, which form gap junction channels with different permeabilities, on the responses of human cells to ionizing radiation. Exposure of confluent HeLa cell cultures to Cs-137 gamma rays, 3.7 MeV alpha particles, 1000 MeV protons or 1000 MeV/u iron ions resulted in distinct effects when the cells expressed gap junction channels composed of either connexin26 (Cx26) or connexin32 (Cx32). Irradiated HeLa cells expressing Cx26 generally showed decreased clonogenic survival and reduced metabolic activity relative to parental cells lacking gap junction communication. In contrast, irradiated HeLa cells expressing Cx32 generally showed enhanced survival and greater metabolic activity relative to the control cells. The effects on clonogenic survival correlated more strongly with effects on metabolic activity than with DNA damage as assessed by micronucleus formation. The data also showed that the ability of a connexin to affect clonogenic survival following ionizing radiation can depend on the specific type of radiation. Together, these findings show that specific types of connexin channels are targets that may be exploited to enhance radiotherapeutic efficacy and to formulate countermeasures to the harmful effects of specific types of ionizing radiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据