4.5 Article

Discovery and initial verification of differentially abundant proteins between multiple sclerosis patients and controls using iTRAQ and SID-SRM

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOMICS
卷 78, 期 -, 页码 312-325

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.09.037

关键词

Multiple sclerosis; Cerebrospinal fluid; Quantitative mass spectrometry; Selected reaction monitoring

资金

  1. National Program for Research in Functional Genomics (FUGE)
  2. Norwegian Research Council
  3. Western Norway Regional Health Authority
  4. Leiv Eiriksson Mobility Program
  5. Meltzer Foundation
  6. Hejes Foundation
  7. Kristian Gerhard Jebsen Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, we aimed to discover cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteins with significant abundance difference between early multiple sclerosis patients and controls, and do an initial verification of these proteins using selected reaction monitoring (SRM). iTRAQ and Orbitrap MS were used to compare the CSF proteome of patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) (n=5), patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis that had CIS at the time of lumbar puncture (n=5), and controls with other inflammatory neurological disease (n=5). Of more than 1200 identified proteins, five proteins were identified with significant abundance difference between the patients and controls. In the initial verification using SRM we analyzed a larger patient and control cohort (n=132) and also included proteins reported as differentially abundant in multiple sclerosis in the literature. We found significant abundance difference for 11 proteins after verification, of which the five proteins alpha-1-antichymotrypsin, contactin-1, apolipoprotein D, clusterin, and kallikrein-6 were significantly differentially abundant in several of the group comparisons. This initial study form the basis for further biomarker verification studies in even larger sample cohorts, to determine if these proteins have relevance as diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers for multiple sclerosis. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据