4.5 Article

SIR: Deterministic protein inference from peptides assigned to MS data

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOMICS
卷 75, 期 13, 页码 4176-4183

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.05.010

关键词

Protein inference; Database dependent search; Computational proteomics

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) Ciencia
  2. European Social Fund
  3. FCT [PTDC/QUI-BIQ/099457/2008, PTDC/EIA-EIA/099458/2008]
  4. UPV/EHU
  5. MCINN
  6. GV/EJ
  7. ERDF
  8. ESF
  9. Department of Industry of the Basque Government (ETORTEK) [IE09-256]
  10. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/EIA-EIA/099458/2008, PTDC/QUI-BIQ/099457/2008] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently the bottom up approach is the most popular for characterizing protein samples by mass spectrometry. This is mainly attributed to the fact that the bottom up approach has been successfully optimized for high throughput studies. However, the bottom up approach is associated with a number of challenges such as loss of linkage information between peptides. Previous publications have addressed some of these problems which are commonly referred to as protein inference. Nevertheless, all previous publications on the subject are oversimplified and do not represent the full complexity of the proteins identified. To this end we present here SIR (spectra based isoform resolver) that uses a novel transparent and systematic approach for organizing and presenting identified proteins based on peptide spectra assignments. The algorithm groups peptides and proteins into five evidence groups and calculates sixteen parameters for each identified protein that are useful for cases where deterministic protein inference is the goal. The novel approach has been incorporated into SIR which is a user-friendly tool only concerned with protein inference based on imports of Mascot search results. SIR has in addition two visualization tools that facilitate further exploration of the protein inference problem. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据