4.5 Article

Protein haptenation by amoxicillin: High resolution mass spectrometry analysis and identification of target proteins in serum

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOMICS
卷 77, 期 -, 页码 504-520

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.09.030

关键词

Drug allergy; beta-Lactam antibiotics; Protein haptenation; Amoxicillin binding; High resolution mass spectrometry; Amoxicillin targets

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [SAF2009-11642]
  2. Plan E
  3. ISCIII [RETIC RD07/0064/0007, PI-0545-2010]
  4. Project PRIN [Z8YTYC]
  5. RETIC [RD07/0064/0000]
  6. Junta de Andalucia [CTS06603, PS09/01768]
  7. EU [CM1001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Allergy towards wide spectrum antibiotics such as amoxicillin (AX) is a major health problem. Protein haptenation by covalent conjugation of AX is considered a key process for the allergic response. However, the nature of the proteins involved has not been completely elucidated. Human serum albumin (HSA) is the most abundant protein in plasma and is considered a major target for haptenation by drugs, including beta-lactam antibiotics. Here we report a procedure for immunological detection of AX protein adducts with antibodies recognizing the lateral chain of the AX molecule. With this approach we detected human serum proteins modified by AX in vitro and identified HSA, transferrin and immunoglobulins heavy and light chains as prominent AX-modified proteins. Since HSA was the major AX target, we characterized AX HSA interaction using high resolution LTQ orbitrap MS. At 0.5 mg/mL AX, we detected one main AX HSA adduct involving residues Lys 190, 199 or 541, whereas higher AX concentrations elicited a more extensive modification. In molecular modeling studies Lys190 and Lys 199 were found the most reactive residues towards AX, with surrounding residues favoring adduct formation. These findings provide novel tools and insight for the study of protein haptenation and the mechanisms involved in AX-elicited allergic reactions. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据