4.5 Article

Oxidative stress-associated shape transformation and membrane proteome remodeling in erythrocytes of end stage renal disease patients on hemodialysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOMICS
卷 74, 期 11, 页码 2441-2452

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.04.009

关键词

End stage renal disease; Hemodialysis; Red blood cell; Membrane proteome; ROS production; Oxidative stress

资金

  1. University of Athens

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study was designed to evaluate the oxidative stress status of erythrocytes and its association with cellular ultrastructure and membrane proteome modifications in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis (HD). For that purpose, we studied red blood cells' (RBCs) modifications in twelve non-diabetic ESRD patients that were responsive in erythropoietin therapy. Intracellular ROS levels were measured by fluorometry, RBCs ultra-structure was examined by electron microscopy, while the membrane proteome by electrophoresis and immunoblotting. Compared to the healthy subjects, the uremic RBCs exhibited significantly increased ROS accumulation. Dialysis partially ameliorated the basal ROS levels but triggered cellular sensitivity to exogenous oxidative stimuli. Common membrane modifications involved loss, aggregation, fragmentation and carbonylation of critical components as well as over-expression of stress markers. HD significantly contributed to membrane proteome remodeling, especially for aquaporin-1, peroxiredoxin-2 and ubiquitinated proteins. The intracellular redox status and the closely associated membrane modifications seemed to be related to membrane instability, loss of surface area through vesiculation, echinocytosis and stomatocytosis. Our data evinced a network of interactions among the uremic toxins, the RBCs membrane composition and the cellular shape modifications in ESRD, which is developed around a core of oxidative provocations and cellular responses. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据