4.7 Article

Untargeted Metabolomic Profiling of Amphenicol-Resistant Campylobacter jejuni by Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 1060-1068

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr501061d

关键词

metabolomic; Campylobacter jejunt; antibiotic resistance; UHPLC-MS; glyceropholipid metabolism

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2013CB127200]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [2014FG045]
  3. Chinese Universities Scientific Fund [2013YJ005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Campylobacter jejuni, an important foodborne microorganism, poses severe and emergent threats to human health as antibiotic resistance becomes increasingly prevalent. The mechanisms of drug resistance are hard to decipher, and little is known at the metabolic level. Here we apply metabolomic profiling to discover metabolic changes associated with amphenicol (chloramphenicol and florfenicol) resistance mutations of Campylobacter jejuni. An optimized sample preparation method was combined with ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-TOF/MS) and pattern recognition for the analysis of small-molecule biomarkers of drug resistance. UHPLC-triple quadrupole MS operated in multiple reaction monitoring mode was used for quantitative analysis of metabolic features from UHPLC-TOF/MS profiling. Up to 41 differential metabolites involved in glycerophospholipid metabolism, sphingolipid metabolism, and fatty acid metabolism were observed in a chloramphenicol-resistant mutant strain of Campylobacter jejuni. A panel of 40 features was identified in florfenicol-resistant mutants, demonstrating changes in glycerophospholipid metabolism, sphingolipid metabolism, and tryptophan metabolism. This study shows that the UHPLC-MS-based metabolomics platform is a promising and valuable tool to generate new insights into the drug-resistant mechanism of Campylobacter jejuni.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据