4.7 Article

Stoichiometry of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Lysine Methylation: Insights into Non-histone Protein Lysine Methyltransferase Activity

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 1744-1756

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr401251k

关键词

lysine methylation; stoichiometry; absolute quantification (AQUA); protein lysine methyltransferases; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; elongation factors; ribosomal proteins

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC)
  2. UNSW
  3. Australian Postgraduate Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Post-translational lysine methylation is well established as a regulator of histone activity; however, it is emerging that these modifications are also likely to play extensive roles outside of the histone code. Here we obtain new insights into non-histone lysine methylation and protein lysine methyltransferase (PKMT) activity by elucidating absolute stoichiometries of lysine methylation, using mass spectrometry and absolute quantification (AQUA), in wild-type and 5 PKMT gene deletion strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. By analyzing 8 sites of methylation in 3 non-histone proteins, elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1 alpha), elongation factor 2 (EF2), and 60S ribosomal protein L42-A/B (Rpl42ab), we find that production of preferred methylation states on individual lysine residues is commonplace and likely occurs through processive PKMT activity, Class I PKMTs can be associated with processive methylation, lysine residues are selectively methylated by specific PKMTs, and lysine methylation exists over a broad range of stoichiometries. Together these findings suggest that specific sites and forms of lysine methylation may play specialized roles in the regulation of non-histone protein activity. We also uncover new relationships between two proteins previously characterized as PKMTs, SEE1 and EFM1, in EF1 alpha methylation and show that past characterizations of EFM1 as having direct PKMT activity may require reinterpretation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据