4.7 Article

Feasibility of Identifying the Tobacco-related Global Metabolome in Blood by UPLC-QTOF-MS

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 679-691

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr3007705

关键词

metabolomics; metabolism; nicotine; validation; carcinogens

资金

  1. Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Center from the National Cancer Institute [P50 84718]
  2. National Institute on Drug Abuse [1R01 CA114377-01A2]
  3. American Lung Association Lung Health Dissertation Grant
  4. NCI - Laboratory Assessment of Tobacco Use Behavior and Exposure to Toxins [N01-PC-64402]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metabolomics is likely an ideal tool to assess tobacco smoke exposure and the impact of cigarette smoke on human exposure and health. To assess reproducibility and feasibility of this by UPLC-QTOF-MS, three experiments were designed for the assessment of smokers' blood. Experiment I was an analysis of 8 smokers with 8 replicates. Experiment II was an analysis of 62 pooled quality control (QC) samples from 7 nonsmokers' plasma placed as every tenth sample among a study of 613 samples from 160 smokers. Finally, to examine the feasibility of metabolomic study in assessing smoke exposure, Experiment III consisted of 9 smokers and 10 nonsmokers' serum to evaluate differences in their global metabolome. There was minimal measurement and sample preparation variation in all experiments, although some caution is needed when analyzing specific parts of the chromatogram. When assessing QC samples in the large scale study, QC clustering indicated high stability, reproducibility, and consistency. Finally, in addition to the identification of nicotine metabolites as expected, there was a characteristic profile distinguishing smokers from nonsmokers. Metabolites selected from putative identifications were verified by MS/MS, showing the potential to identify metabolic phenotypes and new metabolites relating to cigarette smoke exposure and toxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据