4.7 Article

HILIC- and SCX-Based Quantitative Proteomics of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii during Nitrogen Starvation Induced Lipid and Carbohydrate Accumulation

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 5959-5971

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr300692t

关键词

iTRAQ; quantitative proteomics; Chlamydomonas; biofuels; lipid production; carbohydrate production; SCX; HILIC

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/E036252/1]
  2. EPSRC (ChELSI)
  3. NERC [NE/J024767/1]
  4. EPSRC [EP/E036252/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E036252/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitrogen starvation induced changes in carbohydrate and lipid content is described in several algal species. Although these phenotypic changes are desirable, such manipulations also significantly deteriorate culture health, ultimately halting growth. To optimize biofuel production from algae, it is desirable to induce lipid accumulation without compromising cell growth and survival. In this study, we utilized an 8-plex iTRAQ-based proteomic approach to assess the model alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii CCAP 11/32CW15+ under nitrogen starvation. First-dimension fractionation was conducted using HILIC and SCX. A total of 587 proteins were identified (>= 3 peptides) of which 71 and 311 were differentially expressed at significant levels (p < 0.05), during nitrogen stress induced carbohydrate and lipid production, respectively. Forty-seven percent more changes with significance were observed with HILIC compared to SCX. Several trends were observed including increase in energy metabolism, decrease in translation machinery, increase in cell wall production and a change of balance between photosystems I and II. These findings point to a severely compromised system where lipid is accumulated at the expense of normal functioning of the organism, suggesting that a more informed and controlled method of lipid induction than gross nutrient manipulation would be needed for development of sustainable processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据