4.7 Article

Analysis of Polarized Secretion of Fucosylated Alpha-Fetoprotein in HepG2 Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 2798-2806

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr201154k

关键词

AFP-L3; fucose; bile canaliculus; HepG2 cells

资金

  1. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO)
  2. Osaka University
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan
  4. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [21249038]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24590972, 21249038, 23501303] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fucosylated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is a more specific biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) than AFP. However, the mechanisms underlying the increase in fucosylated AFP in sera of HCC patients remain largely unknown. Recently, we reported that fucosylation is a possible signal for the secretion of hepatic glycoproteins into bile and that the fucosylation-based sorting machinery might be disrupted in the liver bearing HCC. In this study, we investigated the selective secretion of fucosylated AFP into bile canaliculus (BC) structures of the human hepatoma cell line HepG2. The proportion of fucosylated AFP in BC structures was higher than that in the medium, as judged by lectin affinity electrophoresis. Suppression of fucosylation by the double knock-down of GDP-mannose-4,6-dehydratase and the human homologue of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymannose-3,5-epimerase-4-reductase, which contribute to the synthesis of GDP-fucose, a donor substrate for fucosyltransferases, did not decrease the proportion of fucosylated AFP in BC structures but decreased this proportion in conditioned medium. Furthermore, increased AFP fucosylation was observed in medium, but not in BC structures, upon adding free fucose. These results suggest that saturation of fucosylated AFP in BC structures is accompanied by its increase in conditioned medium, probably leading to increased fucosylated AFP in sera of HCC patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据