4.7 Article

CAPER: a Chromosome-Assembled human Proteome browsER

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 179-186

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr300831z

关键词

proteomic data; chromosome-centric visualization; proteome browser; human genome annotation; bioinformatics; Chromosome-Centric Human Proteome Project

资金

  1. Chinese National Key Program of Basic Research [2012CB910300, 2011CB910202, 2011CB910600]
  2. Chinese High-technology Research and Development [2012AA020201]
  3. National Key Technology RD Program [2012BAI29B07]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31271407, 31070673, 31170780]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Proteomics [SKLP-O201106, SKLP-Y201102]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-throughput mass spectrometry and antibody-based experiments have begun to produce a large amount of proteomic data sets. Chromosome-based visualization of these data sets and their annotations can help effectively integrate, organize, and analyze them. Therefore, we developed a web-based, user-friendly Chromosome-Assembled human Proteome browsER (CAPER). To display proteomic data sets and related annotations comprehensively, CAPER employs two distinct visualization strategies: track-view for the sequence/site information and the correspondence between proteome, transcriptome, genome, and chromosome and heatmap-view for the qualitative and quantitative functional annotations. CAPER supports data browsing at multiple scales through Google Map-like smooth navigation, zooming, and positioning with chromosomes as the reference coordinate. Both track-view and heatmap-view can mutually switch, providing a high-quality user interface. Taken together, CAPER will greatly facilitate the complete annotation and functional interpretation of the human genome by proteomic approaches, thereby making a significant contribution to the Chromosome-Centric Human Proteome Project and even the human physiology/pathology research. CAPER can be accessed at http://www.bprc.ac.cn/CAPE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据