4.7 Article

Global Proteome Quantification for Discovering Imatinib-Induced Perturbation of Multiple Biological Pathways in K562 Human Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 9, 期 11, 页码 6007-6015

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr100814y

关键词

chronic myeloid leukemia; imatinib; SILAC; erythroid differentiation; histone acetylation

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 CA 116522]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Imatinib mesylate, currently marketed by Novartis as Gleevec in the U.S., has emerged as the leading compound to treat the chronic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), through its inhibition of Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinases, and other cancers. However, resistance to imatinib develops frequently, particularly in late-stage disease. To identify new cellular pathways affected by imatinib treatment, we applied mass spectrometry together with stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) for the comparative study of protein expression in K562 cells that were untreated or treated with a clinically relevant concentration of imatinib. Our results revealed that, among the 1344 quantified proteins, 73 had significantly altered levels of expression induced by imatinib and could be quantified in both forward and reverse SILAC labeling experiments. These included the down-regulation of thymidylate synthase, S-adenosylmethionine synthetase, and glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase as well as the up-regulation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1, hemoglobins, and enzymes involved in heme biosynthesis. We also found, by assessing alteration in the acetylation level in histone H4 upon imatinib treatment, that the imatinib-induced hemoglobinization and erythroid differentiation in K562 cells are associated with global histone H4 hyperacetylation. Overall, these results provided potential biomarkers for monitoring the therapeutic intervention of CML using imatinib and offered important new knowledge for gaining insight into the molecular mechanisms of action of imatinib.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据