4.7 Article

Multivariate Modeling Strategy for Intercompartmental Analysis of Tissue and Plasma 1H NMR Spectrotypes

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 8, 期 5, 页码 2397-2406

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr8010205

关键词

Adrenal gland; Chemometrics; MCR-ALS; MPCA; HRMAS H-1 NMR spectroscopy; Kidney; Liver; Intact tissue; Metabonomics; Pancreas; PARAFAC; PCA; Plasma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multicompartmental metabolic profiling combined with multivariate data analysis offers a unique opportunity to explore the multidimensional metabolic relationships between various biological matrices. Here, we applied unsupervised chemometric methods for integrating H-1 NMR metabolic profiles from mouse plasma, liver, pancreas, adrenal gland and kidney cortex matrices in order to infer intercompartments functional links. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) revealed metabolic differences between matrices but contained limited information on intercompartment metabolic relationships. Multiway PCA enabled the assessment of interindividual metabolic variability across multiple compartments in a single model and, therefore, metabolic correlations between different organs and circulating biofluids. However, this approach does not provide information on the relative contribution of one compartment to another. Integration of metabolic profiles using Multivariate Curve Resolution (MCR) and Parallel Factor Analysis (PARAFAC) methods provided an overview of functional relationships across matrices and enabled the characterization of compartment-specific metabolite signatures, the spectrotypes. In particular, the spectrotypes describe biochemical profiles specific or common to different biological compartments. Consequently, MCR-ALS and PARAFAC appeared to be better adapted for stepwise variable and compartment selection for further correlation analysis. Such a combination of chemometric techniques could provide new research avenues to assess the efficacy of drug or nutritional interventions on targeted organs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据