4.7 Article

Distinction between Human Cytochrome P450 (CYP) Isoforms and Identification of New Phosphorylation Sites by Mass Spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 7, 期 11, 页码 4678-4688

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr800231w

关键词

cytochrome; P450; phosphorylation; CYP; quantification; differentiation; distinction; discrimination; distinguish; mass spectrometry

资金

  1. German Academic Exchange Service
  2. German Ministry of Education and Science [0313080J, 0313080I]
  3. Lundbeck Foundation Research Professor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In mammals, Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes are bound to membranes of the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria, where they are responsible for the oxidative metabolism of many xenobiotics as well as organic endogenous compounds. In humans, 57 isoforms were identified which are classified based on sequence homology. In the present work, we demonstrate the performance of a mass spectrometry-based strategy to simultaneously detect and differentiate distinct human Cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms including the highly similar CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP3A7, as well as CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C18, CYP2C19, and CYP4F2, CYP4F3, CYP4F11, CYP4F12. Compared to commonly used immunodetection methods, mass spectrometry overcomes limitations such as low antibody specificity and offers high multiplexing possibilities. Furthermore, CYP phosphorylation, which may affect various biochemical and enzymatic properties of these enzymes, is still poorly analyzed, especially in human tissues. Using titanium dioxide resin combined with tandem mass spectrometry for phosphopeptide enrichment and sequencing, we discovered eight human P450 phosphorylation sites, seven of which were novel. The data from surgical human liver samples establish that the isoforms CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2E1, CYP2C8, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP3A7, and CYP8B1 are phosphorylated in vivo. These results will aid in further investigation of the functional significance of protein phosphorylation for this important group of enzymes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据