4.8 Article

Sodium storage behavior of Na0.66Ni0.33-xZnxMn0.67O2 (x=0, 0.07 and 0.14) positive materials in diglyme-based electrolytes

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 400, 期 -, 页码 317-324

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.08.037

关键词

Na0.66Ni0.33Mn0.67O2; Zinc substitution; Petroleum coke; Diglyme; Na-ion battery

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0901502]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21233004, 21428303, 21621091]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [MAT2014-56470-R, MAT2017-84002-C2-1-R]
  4. Junta de Andalucia (FQM288 research group)
  5. MESC program
  6. UCO program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The promising application of Na-ion batteries in large-scale energy storage such as smart grid has encouraged intensive research on Na-based insertion compounds and their implementation in full Na-ion cells. Herein, the electrochemical performance of half cells using Na0.66Ni0.33-xZnxMn0.67O2 (x = 0, 0.07 and 0.14) cathodes in diglyme-based electrolyte are first studied. For x = 0.07, high discharge capacities of 120 and 80 mA h g(-1) at 15 and 150 mA g(-1), respectively are measured, with stable operation voltage exceeding 4.0 V vs. Na+/Na and cycling life over 200 cycles. Moreover, DSC results of the charged positive electrodes confirmed that the thermal stability was improved distinctively by zinc modification. Also, graphitized petroleum coke exhibits good performance in diglyme-based electrolyte in terms of stable capacity (100 mA h g(-1)) over 200 cycles in a stable plateau within 0.5-1.0 V vs. Na+ /Na. Thereafter, a full Na-ion battery using Na0.66Ni0.26Zn0.07Mn0.67O2 cathode, diglyme electrolyte, and petroleum coke anode is proposed here that shows impressive performances, i.e. shows high discharge capacity of 86 mA h g(-1) and 85% retention after 155 cycles. It is believed that diglyme-based electrolytes should be readily extended to other layered sodium oxide electrodes and their full cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据