4.8 Article

Large and stable reversible lithium-ion storages from mesoporous SnO2 nanosheets with ultralong lifespan over 1000 cycles

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 268, 期 -, 页码 365-371

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.077

关键词

Tin oxide; Mesoporous; Nanosheets; Lithium-ion batteries; Anode materials

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21003079]
  2. Research Award Fund for Outstanding Middle-Aged and Young Scientist of Shandong Provence [BS2011CL020]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2011BM018]
  4. Qingdao Project of Science and Technology [12-1-4-3-(20)-jch]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The major challenge to promote the commercialization of SnO2 anode materials is to construct unique structures and/or composites that could alleviate the volume effect and extend the lifespan. This study develops an efficient synthetic solution for the preparation of mesoporous SnO2 nanosheets, which involves an evaporation-induced selfassembly process and the following thermal treatment. Surfactant F127 is used as the soft template to form abundant cores. The as-prepared sample intrinsically inherits flexible sheet-like structure and porous features, as characterized with XRD, SEM, TEM and BET techniques. Based on these combining structural benefits, the sample is utilized as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries and exhibits excellent Li+ storage performance such as large and stable reversible capacity, good rate capability, and especially the outstanding durable cycling life of over 1000 cycles, which meets the demands of practical applications. The structural changes of SnO2 nanosheets are observed from the decomposed electrodes after different electrochemical cycles. Moreover, this synthesis strategy may offer an alternative and universal approach for synthesis of other transitional metal oxides or their binary composites as high-performance anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据