4.8 Article

Catalytic effect of titanium nitride nanopowder on hydrogen desorption properties of NaAlH4 and its stability in NaAlH4

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 192, 期 2, 页码 582-587

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.02.083

关键词

Hydrogen storage; Sodium alanate; Catalyst; Titanium nitride nanopowder; In situ X-ray diffraction; In situ Raman spectroscopy

资金

  1. KIST Core Competence Program
  2. Korea Research Foundation
  3. Korean Government (MOEHRD) [KRF-2007-612-D00097]
  4. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [2E21260] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [과C6A2003] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single crystalline titanium nitride (TiN) nanopowder is synthesized by a mechano-chemical reaction between titanium chloride (TiCl3) and lithium nitride (Li3N) by means of high-energy ball milling. The TiN nanopowder has an average particle size of 6 nm and is introduced into sodium alanate (NaAlH4) as a catalyst. During hydrogen sorption cycles, TiN-catalyzed NaAlH4 exhibits a greater hydrogen desorption rate and higher hydrogen capacity than TiCl3-catalyzed NaAlH4. Contradicting thermodynamic predictions, in situ X-ray diffraction results reveal that TiN nanopowder remains stable and produces no by-products (e.g., Ti-Al compounds) in the reaction with NaAlH4 during hydrogen desorption. In situ Raman spectroscopy also confirms the stability of TiN nanopowder in NaAlH4. This implies that the sustained hydrogen sorption kinetics and hydrogen capacity of TiN-catalyzed NaAlH4 originate from the structural and chemical stability of TiN nanopowder in NaAlH4 for the given conditions of the hydrogen cycle test. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据