4.8 Article

Comparison of homogeneously and heterogeneously sulfonated polyetheretherketone membranes in preparation, properties and cell performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 185, 期 1, 页码 63-69

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.06.087

关键词

Direct methanol fuel cell; Sulfonation; Membrane; Polyetheretherketone; Proton conductivity; Methanol permeability

资金

  1. Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) [ROA-2007-000-10029-0]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [과C6A1904, R0A-2007-000-10029-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For application in direct methanol fuel cells, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) membranes with different degrees of sulfonation (40-80%) are prepared by both homogeneous and heterogeneous methods. Sulfonation and its degree are identified by means of Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy and a back-titration method, respectively. Thermal analysis shows that an increase in the sulfonation degree increases the glass-transition temperature and enhances the thermal stability. The room-temperature ion conductivity of the homogeneously sulfonated PEEK (sPEEK) membrane with a 68% degree of sulfonation is higher than that of Nafion (R) 117, while its methanol permeability is lower. The tensile strength of the sPEEK membrane is comparable with that of Nafion (R) 117 at the equilibrium water swollen state. Various properties of sPEEK membranes prepared by two methods are compared. Overall, the ion conductivity of the homogeneous system is higher than that of the heterogeneous counterpart, but there is little difference in methanol permeability. The cell performance of the homogeneously sulfonated PEEK (homo-sPEEK) membrane is much better than that of the heterogeneously sulfonated PEEK (hetero-sPEEK) and Nafion (R) 117 membranes. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据