4.8 Article

Effects of GDC interlayer on performance of low-temperature SOFCs

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 175, 期 1, 页码 345-352

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.09.019

关键词

solid oxide fuel cells; Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95; interfacial modification; impedance spectroscopy; open circuit voltage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To bridge the sintering temperature gap between the electrolyte and the cathode, low-temperature anode supported solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) with various thickness of electrolyte interlayer were fabricated and investigated. The porous thin interlayer was dip-coated and fired onto the dense Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95 (GDC) electrolyte surface. With humidified hydrogen as the fuel and air as the oxidant, the single cell with a 0.15 mu m interlayer achieved the maximum power density (MPD) of 0.9 W cm(-2) at 600 degrees C. The higher open circuit voltages (OCVs) (> 0.9 V at 600 degrees C) were obtained in this study. The impedance results showed that the porous interlayer not only improved the interfacial contact between electrolyte and cathode, but also increased electrochemically active surface area. The cathode/electrolyte polarization resistance exhibited minimum when a 0.15 mu m interlayer was added. The apparent activation energies derived from the Arrhenius plots of interfacial polarization resistances were about the same when the added interlayer was thinner, which indicated that the reaction mechanism did not change. However, the corresponding values were higher as the thick interlayer was introduced, which could be ascribed to the retarded oxygen ion transfer in the added porous layer. The cell area specific resistance (ASR) obtained by linear fitting I-V plot in the region of 0.6-0.7 V was higher than the ohmic resistance tested at OCV condition, and it was potentially attributed to the increased oxygen partial pressure at the anode as well as the contribution from polarization resistance, i.e. polarization of mass transport. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据