4.7 Article

Experimental and numerical study of electrically driven magnetohydrodynamic flow in a modified cylindrical annulus. 11. Instabilities

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 27, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4928897

关键词

-

资金

  1. ERC [247303]
  2. SNF [200020_143596]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200020_143596] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [247303] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present an investigation of the stability of liquid metal flow under the influence of an imposed magnetic field by means of a laboratory experiment as well as a linear stability analysis of the setup using the finite element method. The experimental device ZUrich Cylindrical CHannel INstability Investigation is a modified cylindrical annulus with electrically driven flow of liquid GaInSn operating at Hartmann and Reynolds numbers up to M = 2022 and Re = 2.6. 10(5), respectively. The magnetic field gives rise to a free shear layer at the prominent inner electrode. We identify several flow regimes characterized by the nature of the instabilities. Above a critical current I-c = 0(0.1 A), the steady flow is destabilized by a Kelvin-Helmholtz mechanism at the free shear layer. The instability consists of countenotating vortices traveling with the mean flow. For low forcing, the vortices are restricted to the free shear layer. Their azimuthal wave number m grows with M and decreases with Re. At Re/M approximate to 25, the instability becomes container-filling and energetically significant. It enhances the radial momentum transport which manifests itself in a broadening of the free shear layer width delta(s). We propose that this transition may be related to an unstable Hartmann layer. At Re/M-2 = 0(1), an abrupt change is observed in the mean azimuthal velocity (tTb) and the friction factor F, which we interpret as the transition between an inertialess and an inertial regime. (C) 2015 AIP Publishing LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据