4.7 Article

Experimental and numerical study of electrically driven magnetohydrodynamic flow in a modified cylindrical annulus. I. Base flow

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 27, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4923746

关键词

-

资金

  1. ERC [247303]
  2. SNF [200020_143596]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [247303] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200020_143596] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Shear layers in confined liquid metal magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) flow play an important role in geo- and astrophysical bodies as well as in engineering applications. We present an experimental and numerical study of liquid metal MHD flow in a modified cylindrical annulus that is driven by an azimuthal Lorentz force resulting from a forced electric current under an imposed axial magnetic field. Hartmann and Reynolds numbers reach M-max approximate to 2000 and Re-max approximate to 1.3 x 10(4), respectively, in the steady regime. The peculiarity of our model geometry is the protruding inner disk electrode which gives rise to a free Shercliff layer at its edge. The flow of liquid GaInSn in the experimental device ZUCCHINI (ZUrich Cylindrical CHannel INstability Investigation) is probed with ultrasound Doppler velocimetry. We establish the base flow in ZUCCHINI and study the scaling of velocities and the free Shercliff layer in both experiment and finite element simulations. Experiment and numerics agree well on the mean azimuthal velocity u(phi)(r) following the prediction of a large-M theoretical model. The large-M limit, which is equivalent to neglecting inertial effects, appears to be reached for M greater than or similar to 30 in our study. In the numerics, we recover the theoretical scaling of the free Shercliff layer delta(S) similar to M-1/2 whereas dS appears to be largely independent of M in the experiment. (C) 2015 AIP Publishing LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据