4.5 Article

Cell differentiation in the longitudinal veins and formation of commissural veins in rice (Oryza sativa) and maize (Zea mays)

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT RESEARCH
卷 121, 期 6, 页码 593-602

出版社

SPRINGER TOKYO
DOI: 10.1007/s10265-008-0189-1

关键词

Commissural vein; Longitudinal vein; Oryza sativa; Procambium; Vascular development; Zea mays

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
  3. Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution (BRAIN)
  4. University of Tokyo
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19060009] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vascular development is a central theme in plant science. However, little is known about the mechanism of vascular development in monocotyledons (compared with dicotyledons). Therefore, we investigated sequential processes of differentiation into various different vascular cells by carrying out detailed observations using serial sections of the bases of developing leaves of rice and maize. The developmental process of the longitudinal vascular bundles was divided into six stages in rice and five stages in maize. The initiation of differentiation into procambial progenitor cells forming the commissural vein arose in a circular layer cell that was adjacent to both a metaxylem vessel and one or a few phloem cells in stage V longitudinal vascular bundles. In most cases the differentiation of ground meristem cells into procambial progenitor cells extended in one direction, toward the next longitudinal vascular bundle, and subsequent periclinal divisions and further differentiation produced a vessel element, two companion cells and a sieve element to form a commissural vein. These results suggest the presence of an intercellular signal(s) that induces differentiation of the circular layer cell and the ground meristem cells into procambial progenitor cells, forming a commissural vein sequentially.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据