4.7 Article

Gene families of maize glutathione-ascorbate redox cycle respond differently to abiotic stresses

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 169, 期 2, 页码 183-192

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.08.018

关键词

Maize; GSH-ASC cycle; Antioxidant; Stress

资金

  1. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The glutathione-ascorbate (GSH-ASC) cycle in plants plays an important role in detoxifying reactive oxygen species. Little is known about how the enzymes and antioxidants in the maize GSH-ASC cycle respond to stress. We clarified the genome positions, exon-intron structures and predicted subcellular locations of the ascorbate peroxidase (APX), monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDAR), dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) and glutathione reductase (GR) families in maize. ABA treatment increased the transcript levels of most of the APX genes except ZmAPX3 and ZmAPX6, upregulated the transcription of ZmMDAR1 and downregulated the transcriptions of ZmMDAR3 and ZmMDAR4. However, it had little effect on the expressions of the ZmDHAR and ZmGR gene families. ABA treatment increased the activities of only 2 enzymes, ZmAPX and ZmDHAR. The PEG treatment led to similar expression patterns as that of ABA. ZmAPX1.1 and ZmAPX2 exhibited the same expression patterns under PEG treatment conditions. Enzyme activities were not affected by the PEG treatment with the exception of a significant decrease in MDAR activity that was observed after 6 h. Compared to the ABA and PEG treatments, the NaCl treatment only slightly affected the transcription of the four gene families but significantly increased the activity of ZmGR. The ABA and PEG treatments elevate the ASC levels and decrease the GSSG level. Our results show that the gene families of the maize GSH-ASC redox cycle respond differently to abiotic stresses and suggest that APX and MDAR may play more important roles in stress tolerance in plants. (C) 2011 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据