4.7 Article

Differential induction of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase gene expression in response to in vitro callus unions of Prunus spp.

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 165, 期 7, 页码 705-714

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2007.05.015

关键词

flavonoid biosynthesis; graft incompatibility; in vitro callus union; PAL expression pattern

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) is a key enzyme in the synthesis of phenolic compounds, which play a prominent role in graft union formation, including the marked effects of their accumulation in incompatibility response. The purpose of this study was to assess changes in the abundance of PAL mRNA during graft union development. Partial cDNA clones encoding the enzyme were isolated from in vitro callus tissue in the apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cultivar Moniqui and the plum rootstock Marianna 2624 (Prunus munsoniana x Prunus cerasifera). The deduced partial amino acid sequence showed high homology with PAL genes from other plant species. We monitored PAL expression 5, 10, 15 and 20 days after the establishment of in vitro callus unions. The levels of PAL mRNA increased 5 days after grafting in both compatible and incompatible unions. Nevertheless, significant differences were observed at the transcript level through both types of combinations from the second week. The results showed a higher level of PAL transcription in graft unions of incompatible partners, where a tack of adaptation between stock and scion takes place. The level of scion-stock compatibility was related to the PAL expression pattern. In addition, cell watts of the callus cells were not stained by phloroglucinol-HCl, indicating that the increased PAL expression did not result in the formation of lignin. However, staining with Naturstoff reagent A confirmed the highest accumulation of soluble and watt-bound phenolic compounds at the graft interface of incompatible unions. (c) 2007 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据