4.6 Review

Cerebral blood flow alteration in neuroprotection following cerebral ischaemia

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 589, 期 17, 页码 4105-4114

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.209601

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fondation Leducq
  2. Medical Research Council UK
  3. Dunhill Medical Trust
  4. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre
  5. Medical Research Council [G0500495] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0508-10213] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The best neuroprotectant for acute ischaemic stroke would always be the rapid return of oxygen and glucose to physiological levels. This is currently provided by thrombolysis which restores blood flow to the ischaemic region. The attempt to confer neuroprotection by targeting the brain parenchyma has shown promise in experimental stroke models, but has unequivocally failed to translate to the clinic. Neuroprotective therapy primarily targets the biochemical cascade that produces cell death following cerebral ischaemia. However, these agents may also alter signal transduction that controls cerebral blood flow, for example glutamate, which may affect the outcome after ischaemia. In these cases, neuroprotection may potentially be due to the improved access to oxygen and glucose rather than biochemical prevention of cell death. Improvement in cerebral blood flow is an important but often overlooked effect of neuroprotective therapy, analogous to the protective effects of drug-induced hypothermia. This short review will discuss cerebral blood flow alteration and protection of the brain in the context of ischaemic preconditioning, oxygen sensing and thrombolysis. Future neuroprotection studies in cerebral ischaemia require stringent monitoring of cerebral blood flow, plus other physiological parameters. This will increase the chances that any protection observed may be able to translate to human therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据