4.1 Article

Isoproterenol-induced hypertrophied rat hearts: Does short-term treatment correspond to long-term treatment?

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 58, 期 3, 页码 179-188

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.2170/physiolsci.RP004508

关键词

conductance catheter; echocardiography; left ventricular volumetry; systolic pressure-volume area

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In consideration of clinical implications, it is often complained that short-term experimental diseased heart models do not mimic long-term diseased hearts that are often clinically encountered. The aim of the present study was (i) to compare the left ventricular function between rat cardiac hypertrophy models treated with isoproterenol for 3 days (Iso 3d) and 7 days (Iso 7d) by pressure-volume measurements with a catheter method, and (ii) to follow up the left ventricular function in the same model treated with Iso up to 16 weeks with a less-invasive echocardiography. An infusion of either Iso (1.2 mg(.)kg(-1) day(-1) for 3 days-16 weeks) or vehicle (saline 24 mu l(.)day(-1) for 3 days-16 weeks; Sa group) was performed by subcutaneously implanting an osmotic minipump. There were no significant differences in the systolic pressure-volume area at midrange left ventricular volume (PVA(mLVV): a mechanical work capability index) between Iso 3d and 7d groups, though PVA(mLVV) in both groups was significantly reduced from that in the Sa group. From echocardiography, the left ventricular function of the hypertrophy models at 3 days, 1 week, and 2 weeks was unchanged, but the model at a term longer than 4 weeks resulted in prolonged systolic failure. The results indicated that (i) no marked differences in the left ventricular mechanical work capability were found between the Iso 3d and 7d groups, and that (ii) only a 3-day Iso infusion induced the hypertrophy model similar in shape and function to that induced by a 2-week Iso infusion. We concluded that the 3-day model was sufficient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据