4.1 Article

The Effect of Intense Interval Cycle-training on Unloading-Induced Dysfunction and Atrophy in the Human Calf Muscle

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 29-35

出版社

JAPAN SOC PHYSIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
DOI: 10.2114/jpa2.30.29

关键词

unilateral lower limb suspension; countermeasure; muscle strength; activation capacity; muscle size; cycle ergometer

资金

  1. Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture [17300207]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated whether intense interval training on a cycle ergometer would prevent loss of muscle strength and atrophy in the human calf during unilateral lower limb suspension (ULLS). The present study involved 11 healthy men. We defined unloading leg and contralateral leg as ULLS-leg and CONT-leg, respectively. The subjects were divided into 2 groups: one with single-leg cycling training (Tr-UL, n=6); the other as a control (UL, n=5). The Tr-UL group performed an intense 25-min interval cycling training up to 80% of peak oxygen uptake on alternate days during 20-d ULLS. It was found that: I) in maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and the cross-sectional area of the planter flexor, there was a significant time- (pre-ULLS and post-ULLS) by-leg (ULLS-leg and CONT-leg) interaction; 2) in voluntary activation during MVC evaluated by the twitch interpolation technique, no significant time-by-leg interaction was detected but the trend of change from before to after ULLS tended to be different between ULLS-leg and CONT-leg; and 3) regarding ULLS-leg, the change in any parameters was not significantly different between the Tr-UL and UL groups. These results suggest that unloading induces dysfunction and atrophy in the human calf and that high-intensity interval training on a cycle ergometer cannot significantly prevent unloading-induced deconditioning in the human calf. I Physiol Anthropol 30(1): 29-35, 2011 http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/browse/jpa2 [DOI: 10.2114/jpa2.30.29]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据