4.5 Article

Geometric frustration in small colloidal clusters

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER
卷 21, 期 42, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/21/42/425103

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [EP/E501214/1]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21224011] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study the structure of clusters in a model colloidal system with competing interactions using Brownian dynamics simulations. A short-ranged attraction drives clustering, while a weak, long-ranged repulsion is used to model electrostatic charging in experimental systems. The former is treated with a short-ranged Morse attractive interaction, the latter with a repulsive Yukawa interaction. We consider the yield of clusters of specific structure as a function of the strength of the interactions, for clusters with m = 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10 and 13 colloids. At sufficient strengths of the attractive interaction (around 10k(B)T), the average bond lifetime approaches the simulation timescale and the system becomes nonergodic. For small clusters, m <= 5, where geometric frustration is not relevant, despite nonergodicity, for sufficient strengths of the attractive interaction the yield of clusters which maximize the number of bonds approaches 100%. However for m = 7 and higher, in the nonergodic regime we find a lower yield of these structures where we argue geometric frustration plays a significant role. m = 6 is a special case, where two structures, of octahedral and C-2v symmetry, compete, with the latter being favoured by entropic contributions in the ergodic regime and by kinetic trapping in the nonergodic regime. We believe that our results should be valid as long as the one-component description of the interaction potential is valid. A system with competing electrostatic repulsions and van der Waals attractions may be such an example. However, in some cases, the one-component description of the interaction potential may not be appropriate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据