4.6 Article

ABJ triality: from higher spin fields to strings

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/46/21/214009

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundamental Laws Initiative Fund at Harvard University
  2. NSF [PHY-0847457]
  3. Swarnjayanti fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We demonstrate that a supersymmetric and parity violating version of Vasiliev's higher spin gauge theory in AdS(4) admits boundary conditions that preserve N = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 or 6 supersymmetries. In particular, we argue that the Vasiliev theory with U(M) Chan-Paton and N = 6 boundary condition is holographically dual to the 2+1 dimensional U(N)(k) x U(M)(-k) ABJ theory in the limit of large N, k and finite M. In this system all bulk higher spin fields transform in the adjoint of the U(M) gauge group, whose bulk t'Hooft coupling is M/N. Analysis of boundary conditions in Vasiliev theory allows us to determine exact relations between the parity breaking phase of Vasiliev theory and the coefficients of two and three point functions in Chern-Simons vector models at large N. Our picture suggests that the supersymmetric Vasiliev theory can be obtained as a limit of type IIA string theory in AdS(4) x CP3, and that the non-Abelian Vasiliev theory at strong bulk 't Hooft coupling smoothly turn into a string field theory. The fundamental string is a singlet bound state of Vasiliev's higher spin particles held together by U(M) gauge interactions. This is illustrated by the thermal partition function of free ABJ theory on a two sphere at large M and N even in the analytically tractable free limit. In this system the traces or strings of the low temperature phase break up into their Vasiliev particulate constituents at a U(M) deconfinement phase transition of order unity. At a higher temperature of order T = root N/M Vasiliev's higher spin fields themselves break up into more elementary constituents at a U(N) deconfinement temperature, in a process described in the bulk as black hole nucleation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据