4.6 Article

Size Distribution and Frustrated Antiferromagnetic Coupling Effects on the Magnetic Behavior of Ultrafine Akaganeite (β-FeOOH) Nanoparticles

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 118, 期 36, 页码 21128-21139

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp5048634

关键词

-

资金

  1. Mexican Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT)
  2. Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon [CB12-179486, PAICYT-CE793-11]
  3. MINECO [MAT2010-20798-C05-04]
  4. FEDER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The magnetic properties of low dimensional materials of several iron oxyhydroxide phases, such as akaganeite (beta-FeOOH) or lepidocrocite (gamma-FeO(OH)), remain poorly explored, probably due to their specific preparation as single crystalline phase requires special conditions owing to their structural instability. In the present work, ultrafine akaganeite nanoparticles were prepared by the hydrolysis of FeCl3 solutions at room temperature induced by the presence of NaOH. The resulting product was characterized by several analytical techniques. Structural investigations using X-ray diffraction (XRD), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) revealed that the sample was mainly constituted by rather-equiaxial akaganeite nanocrystals with mean diameter of 3.3 +/- 0.5 nm. In addition, a small amount of rodlike akaganeite particles with 23 +/- 5 nm in length and 5 +/- 1 nm in width was also detected. The study of the respective dependences of the dc magnetization and the ac susceptibility on temperature and exciting magnetic field revealed complex magnetic relaxation processes, high coercivity values at low temperature, and exchange bias effect. These results have been tentatively explained considering size distribution effects and the presence of superparamagnetic and spin glass-like contributions arising from the frustration of the antiferromagnetic order owing to surface effects and an insufficient filling of the akaganeite channels with Cl anions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据