4.6 Article

Effect of Alloying on the Optical Properties of Ag-Au Nanoparticles

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 117, 期 6, 页码 3062-3068

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp309957y

关键词

-

资金

  1. GENCI-IDRIS [2012-096829]
  2. European Community through the ETSF-I3 project of the ETSF [211956, 69]
  3. French National Agency (ANR) [ANR-08-NANO-003]
  4. COST Action [MP0903]
  5. [NSF-DMR-1103730]
  6. [NSF-PREM DMR-0934218]
  7. [UTSA-TRAC FY2011-2012]
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  9. Division Of Materials Research [1103730] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  11. Division Of Materials Research [934218] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The optical response of Au-Ag bimetallic nanoalloys has been studied using pseudopotential time-dependent density-functional theory calculations. The structures included the magic-number icosahedral nanoparticles of 55 and 147 atoms, 37-atom pentagonal rods, and 20-atom tetrahedra. Our results show strong resonances for the pure Ag nanoparticles and strongly broadened spectra with many transitions for the pure gold structures, in qualitative agreement with available experiment and previous calculations. For bimetallic core-shell particles, the outer shell determines the overall character of the optical response; a single outer layer of Ag can produce an Ag-like resonance even in a gold-rich structure. The inclusion of a gold core within a silver shell leads to a distinct red-shift of the silver-like resonances as well as to some damping. The bimetallic nanoparticles are found to be very sensitive to the chemical configuration, the position of the atomic species in some cases outweighing the effect of changing composition. For randomly alloyed configurations of 147-atom nanoparticles, the spectra show a smooth transition between pure Ag and Au and are in good qualitative agreement with available experiment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据