4.6 Article

Effects of Precursor Type on the CVD Growth of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 117, 期 20, 页码 10397-10409

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp3125236

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-FG02-06ER15836]
  2. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC03-76SF00098]
  3. TAMU Supercomputer Center
  4. Brazos HPC Cluster at Texas AM University
  5. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-06ER15836] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) can be grown using chemical vapor deposition methods consisting of the catalyzed decomposition of a precursor gasP on the surface of (usually) metal nanocatalysts. Among the many variables affecting the process, the nature of the precursor gas is particularly interesting because nanotube growth mechanism may be closely dependent on the specific decomposition products. Here we investigate and compare simulated SWCNT growth under two precursor decomposition products: single carbon atoms and dimers. Specifically we evaluate the effect of the precursor type on carbon association within the nanoparticle, nanotube quality, and nanotube chirality. Compared to a synthesis based on carbon atoms as the main dominant species, it is found that when carbon dimers are the main precursor decomposition products, carbon dissolution as well as carbon association inside the nanoparticle are slowed down, and nucleation is accelerated, increasing the risk of carbon encapsulation. In the growth stage, dimers can be incorporated into the nanotube rim without previous splitting. As a consequence, the kinetics of self-healing is altered, favorably affecting the quality of the nascent tube, evaluated through the formation of hexagonal rings and occurrence of bamboo growth. Finally, the dimer precursor product results in a moderate bias toward formation of near-arm-chair chiralities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据