4.6 Article

Influence of Electrolyte Cations on Electron Transport and Electron Transfer in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 116, 期 19, 页码 10468-10475

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp211807w

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC (U.K.)
  2. EPSRC [EP/E035469/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E035469/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of different electrolyte cations ((Li+, Na+, Mg2(+), tetrabutyl ammonium (TBA(+))) on the TiO2 conduction band energy (E-c) the effective electron lifetime (tau(n)), and the effective electron diffusion coefficient (D-n) in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs) was studied quantitatively. The separation between E-c and the redox Fermi level, E-F,E-redox, was found to decrease as the charge/radius ratio of the cations increased. E-c in the Mg2+ electrolyte was found to be 170 meV lower than that in the Na+ electrolyte and 400 meV lower than that in the TBA(+) electrolyte. Comparison of D-n and tau(n) in the different electrolytes was carried out by using the trapped electron concentration as a measure of the energy difference between E-c and the quasi-Fermi level, E-n(F), under different illumination levels. Plots of D-n as a function of the trapped electron density, n(upsilon), were found to be relatively insensitive to the electrolyte cation, indicating that the density and energetic distribution of electron traps in TiO2 are similar in all of the electrolytes studied. By contrast, plots of tau(n) versus n(t) for the different cations showed that the rate of electron back reaction is more than an order of magnitude faster in the TBA(+) electrolyte compared with the Na+ and Li+ electrolytes. The electron diffusion lengths in the different electrolytes followed the sequence of Na+ > Li+ > Mg2+ > TBA(+). The trends observed in the AM 1.5 current-voltage characteristics of the DSCs are rationalized on the basis of the conduction band shifts and changes in electron lifetime.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据