4.5 Article

Salt Effects in the Formation of Self-Assembled Lithocholate Helical Ribbons and Tubes

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 116, 期 36, 页码 11344-11355

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp305365m

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The formation of self-assembled nanotubes is usually We present experimental data as evidence of the role played by electrostatics accounted for by anisotropic elastic properties of membranelike precursors. in the formation of self-assembled tubes in alkaline aqueous suspensions of lithocholic acid (LCA). Striking salt effects are characterized by comparing the rheological, dynamical, and scattering properties of systems prepared either in stoichiometric neutralization conditions (SC) of LCA or in a large excess of sodium hydroxide (EOC, experimentally optimized conditions) and finally, in two steps: stoichiometric neutralization followed by an appropriate addition of NaCl (AISC). The SC liquid system is originally made up of loose helical ribbons (previous transmission electron microscopy data), and upon aging they exhibit both intra- and interordering processes. Initially, the helical ribbons are loose and progressively wind around a cylinder (R = 330 angstrom) with their edges exposed to the solvent. They can be temporarily organized in a centered rectangular two-dimensional lattice (pgg, a = 224 angstrom, b = 687 angstrom). Upon further aging, the ribbons wind into more compact helical ribbons (or tubes with helical grooves): their edges are less-exposed and their ordering vanishes. Upon addition of NaCl salt (as in the AISC systems), the specific screening of the intra-aggregate electrostatic repulsions induces the closure of the ribbons into tubes (R-ext = 260 angstrom, R-int = 245 angstrom as in the EOC systems). Simultaneously with the closure of the ribbons into plain tubes, a drastic enhancement of their interconnectivity through van der Waals attractions develops. Eventually, gels are obtained with networks having hexagonal bundles of tubes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据