4.5 Article

Efficient Free Energy Calculations for Compounds with Multiple Stable Conformations Separated by High Energy Barriers

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 113, 期 38, 页码 12711-12720

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp902968m

关键词

-

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  2. VENI Grant [700.55.401]
  3. Horizon Breakthrough Grant [935.18.018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Compounds with high intramolecular energy barriers represent challenging targets for free energy calculations because of the difficulty to obtain sufficient conformational sampling. Existing approaches are therefore computationally very demanding, thus preventing practical applications for such compounds. We present an enhanced sampling-one step perturbation method (ES-OS) to tackle this problem in a highly efficient way. A single molecular dynamics simulation of a judiciously chosen reference state (using two sets of soft-core interactions) is sufficient to determine conformational distributions of chemically similar compounds and the free energy differences between them. The ES-OS method is applied to a set of five biologically relevant 8-substituted GTP analogs having high energy barriers between the anti and the syn conformations of the base with respect to the ribose part. The reliability of ES-OS is verified by comparing the results to Hamiltonian replica exchange simulations of GTP and 8-Br-GTP and the experimentally determined (3)J(C4,H1') coupling constant for GMP in water. Additional simulations in vacuum and octanol allow LIS to calculate differences in the solvation free energies and in lipophilicities (log P). Free energy contributions from individual conformational regions are also calculated, and their relationship with the overall free energy is derived leading to a set of multiconformational free energy formulas. These relationships are of general applicability and call be used in free energy calculations for a more diverse set of compounds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据