4.5 Article

Thermodynamics of peptide insertion and aggregation in a lipid bilayer

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 112, 期 34, 页码 10528-10534

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp804710v

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. National Institutes of Health [GM34921]
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  4. National Biomedical Computing Resource
  5. Keck Foundation
  6. Center for Theoretical and Biological Physics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A variety of biomolecules mediate physiological processes by inserting and reorganizing in cell membranes, and the thermodynamic forces responsible for their partitioning are of great interest. Recent experiments provided valuable data on the free energy changes associated with the transfer of individual amino acids from water to membrane. However, a complete picture of the pathways and the associated changes in energy of peptide insertion into a membrane remains elusive. To this end, computational techniques supplement the experimental data with atomic-level details and shed light on the energetics of insertion. Here, we employed the technique of umbrella sampling in a total 850 ns of all-atom molecular dynamics simulations to study the free energy profile and the pathway of insertion of a model hexapeptide consisting of a tryptophan and five leucines (WL5). The computed free energy profile of the peptide as it travels from bulk solvent through the membrane core exhibits two minima: a local minimum at the water-membrane interface or the headgroup region and a global minimum at the hydrophobic-hydrophilic interface close to the lipid glycerol region. A rather small barrier of roughly 1 kcal mol(-1) exists at the membrane core, which is explained by the enhanced flexibility of the peptide when deeply inserted. Combining our results with those in the literature, we present a thermodynamic model for peptide insertion and aggregation which involves peptide aggregation upon contact with the membrane at the solvent-lipid headgroup interface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据