4.7 Article

Study of B±,0 → J/ψK+K-K±,0 and search for B0 → J/ψφ at BABAR

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 91, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.012003

关键词

-

资金

  1. SLAC
  2. U.S. Department of Energy
  3. National Science Foundation
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada)
  5. Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique and Institut National de Physique Nucleaire et de Physique des Particules (France)
  6. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Germany)
  7. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (Italy)
  8. Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter (Netherlands)
  9. Research Council of Norway
  10. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
  11. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (Spain)
  12. Science and Technology Facilities Council (United Kingdom)
  13. Marie-Curie IEF program (European Union)
  14. A.P. Sloan Foundation (USA)
  15. Binational Science Foundation (USA-Israel)
  16. STFC [ST/M000729/1, ST/N000420/1, ST/L003163/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  17. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/M000729/1, ST/L003163/1, ST/L003163/1 LHCb Upgrades, ST/N000420/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  18. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  19. Division Of Physics [1404070] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  20. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  21. Division Of Physics [0969487, 1205805, 1505719] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study the rare B meson decays B-+/-,B-0 -> J/psi(K+K-K +/-,0), B-+/-,B-0 -> J/psi phi K-+/-,K-0, and search for B-0 -> J/psi phi, using 469 x 10(6) B (B) over bar events collected at the Upsilon(4S) resonance with the BABAR detector at the PEP-II e(+)e(-) asymmetric energy collider. We present new measurements of branching fractions and a study of the J/psi phi mass distribution in search of new charmonium-like states. In addition, we search for the decay B-0 -> J/psi phi and find no evidence of a signal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据