4.7 Article

Destroying a near-extremal Kerr black hole with a charged particle: Can a test magnetic field serve as a cosmic censor?

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 91, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.064025

关键词

-

资金

  1. UzAS (Uzbekistan Academy of Sciences) [F2-FA-F113, FA-A5-F016, F2-FA-F029]
  2. ICTP (Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics) [OEA-PRJ-29, OEA-NET-76]
  3. Volkswagen Stiftung [86 866]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate the effect of a test magnetic field on the process of destroying a near-extremal Kerr black hole with a charged test particle. It has been shown that it would be possible to throw a charged test particle into the near extremal rotating black hole and make it go past the extremality, i.e., turn the Kerr black hole into the Kerr-Newmann naked singularity. Typically, in an astrophysical scenario, black holes are believed to be surrounded by a magnetic field. The magnetic field, although small, affects the motion of charged particles drastically due to the large Lorentz force, as the electromagnetic force is much stronger than the gravity. Thus, a test magnetic field can affect the process of destroying black holes and restore the cosmic censorship in the astrophysical context. We show that a test magnetic field would act as a cosmic censor beyond a certain threshold value. We try to gauge the magnitude of the magnetic field by comparing its energy density with that of the change in the curvature induced by the test particle. We find that the magnetic field required is either as strong as or slightly stronger as compared to the value for which its effect on the background geometry is comparable to the tiny backreaction as that of the test particle. In such a case, however, one has to take into account effect of the magnetic field on the background geometry, which is difficult to implement in the absence of any exact near-extremal rotating magnetized black hole solutions. We expect that magnetic field would still act as a cosmic censor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据