4.6 Article

An exhaustive study of a novel sulfur-linked adamantane tetrasubstituted zinc(II) phthalocyanine incorporated into liposomes

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2012.02.022

关键词

Carriers; Liposomes; Stability; Phthalocyanines; Singlet oxygen

资金

  1. University of Buenos Aires [X-063]
  2. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET) [PIP 104]
  3. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica [PICT 1030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The lipophilic tetrasubstituted sensitizer 2,9(10),16(17),23(24)-tetrakis-(1-adamantylsulfanyl) phthalocyaninatozinc(II) (ZnPc) was incorporated into different liposomal formulations in order to evaluate its photophysical properties, as well as the size, incorporation efficiency, thermotropic properties and stability of liposomes during a time period. Liposomes were prepared by the thin-layer evaporation technique followed by hydratation with buffer at pH 7.4 and 0.15 M NaCl. Small unilamellar vesicles (SUV) were obtained after sonicating the mixture. Phthalocyanine was incorporated efficiently into all the liposomal formulations. The shape of ZnPc spectra depended on the environment. The S-PEG liposomal formulation showed the lowest aggregation value. The average diameter of liposomes with different lipid compositions varied from 49.70 +/- 0.09 to 223.10 +/- 0.36 nm, with significant differences between the various liposomal preparations. The inclusion of cholesterol (CHOL) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) on the lipid bilayer did not influence the size of the particles. The formulations with PEG increased the stability of liposomes for at least 9 months. After a long storage, the most stable formulations were those without CHOL. Singlet molecular oxygen values ranged between 0.10 and 0.26. These values were higher than other zinc(II) phthalocyanines incorporated into dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine (DMPC) liposomes or Tween 80. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据