4.4 Article

Inhibitory effect of Astragalus membranaceus root on matrix metalloproteinase-1 collagenase expression and procollagen destruction in ultraviolet B-irradiated human dermal fibroblasts by suppressing nuclear factor kappa-B activity

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY
卷 65, 期 1, 页码 142-148

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.2012.01570.x

关键词

Astragalus membranaceus; Hs68 fibroblast; nuclear factor kappa-B P65; procollagen; ultraviolet

资金

  1. Kyung Hee-Amore Pacific Beauty and Health Research Center, Kyung Hee University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives The root of Astragalus membranaceus, regarded as a tonic in traditional Korean medicine, has been prescribed for long periods to treat chronic illness by boosting the immune system. Ultraviolet (UV) irradiation causes damage to skin connective tissue by degrading collagen, which is a major structural component of the extracellular matrix. Such damage is considered to be a cause of the wrinkling observed in premature ageing of the skin. This study has investigated the photo-protective effect of A. membranaceus on UVB radiation-induced activation of nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-?B) activity in human dermal fibroblasts. Methods Hs68 fibroblast cells cultured with various concentrations of A. membranaceus were exposed to UVB (40 mJ/cm2). Activation of NF-?B P65 and expression of matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) and type 1 procollagen were measured by Western blotting. Translocation of NF-?B P65 and MMP-1 regulation were also examined by immunocytochemistry. Key findings Western blotting and immunocytochemistry results showed that A. membranaceus inhibited UVB-induced translocation of NF-?B P65 and MMP-1 expression. The data suggested that A. membranaceus restored type 1 procollagen synthesis by inhibiting NF-?B P65 activity and MMP-1 expression in UVB-exposed human dermal fibroblasts. Conclusion A. membranaceus is a candidate for use in skin protection from UVB-induced skin inflammation and photoageing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据