4.5 Article

Butyrate suppresses abnormal proliferation in colonic epithelial cells under diabetic state by targeting HMGB1

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 139, 期 4, 页码 266-274

出版社

JAPANESE PHARMACOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphs.2018.07.012

关键词

Diabetes; Butyrate; Proliferation; HMGB1; Colonic epithelial cells

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81270442]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [2014A030310041]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Butyrate is widely accepted as a proliferation inhibitor in colon cancer but less thoroughly characterized in the colonic epithelium of objects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The present study investigated the regulatory effect of butyrate on proliferation, the related molecule high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) and the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) in the colon of db/db type 2 diabetic model mice and non-cancerous NCM460 colon cells. Proliferation and the expression of HMGB1 and RAGE were increased and could be partially reversed by butyrate treatment in the colon of db/db mice, which were consistent in NCM460 cells under a high glucose state. In NCM460 cells, under the normal glucose state, proliferation increased by overexpression of HMGB1. Under a high glucose state, increased expression of HMGB1 was accompanied with a release from cell nuclei into the cytoplasm and extracellular matrix. Down-regulation of HMGB1 could lower the expression of RAGE and attenuate the abnormally increased proliferation. And overexpression of HMGB1 reversed the suppressing effect of butyrate on abnormally increased proliferation. Conclusively, butyrate suppressed the abnormally increased proliferation in colonic epithelial cells under diabetic state by targeting HMGB1. (c) 2019 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B. V. on behalf of Japanese Pharmacological Society. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons. org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据